Legal Opinion
Turner v. Kight
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 7, 2008No. 5, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.
The question before us is whether petitioner’s complaint was erroneously dismissed by the Circuit Court for Montgomery County on the ground that the causes pled were barred by limitations. That question hinges on the proper construction to be given to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d), which provides for the tolling of State statutes of limitations with respect to State-law claims (i) that are brought in a U.S. District Court, (ii) that are within the “supplemental jurisdiction” of that court, but (iii) over which the court eventually declines to exercise jurisdiction. We interpret § 1367(d) differently…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Artis v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Varnell v. Dora Consolidated School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Kumar v. DhandaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Rounds v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Murphy v. Liberty Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.