Holloway v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
Carjacking “with the intent to cause death or serious bodily harm” is a federal crime.1 The question presented in this case is whether that phrase requires the Government to prove that the defendant had an unconditional intent to kill or harm in all events, or whether it merely requires proof of an intent to kill or harm if necessary to effect a carjacking. Most of the judges who have considered the question have concluded, as do we, that Congress intended to criminalize the more typical carjacking carried out by means of a deliberate threat of violence, rather than just the rare case in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by379 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, AlbertoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Carrie A. McMellon Lori Dawn White Kathy D. Templeton Cheri Call v. United States of America United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
374 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.