City of Los Angeles v. County of Kern
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Though federal court jurisdiction is constrained by article III of the United States Constitution principally to claims presenting a federal case or controversy or disputes between diverse parties, federal courts may assume supplemental jurisdiction over related state claims that “form part of the same case or controversy.” (28 U.S.C. § 1367(a); see Mine Workers v. Gibbs (1966) 383 U.S. 715, 725 [16 L.Ed.2d 218, 86 S.Ct. 1130] [federal jurisdiction extends to state claims that share “a common nucleus of operative fact” with a federal claim].) The assumption and retention of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Artis v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth.California Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. RinehartCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Franceschi v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Newark Unified School District v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.