Legal Opinion

Chaney v. Providence Health Care

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 20, 2011No. 29438-2-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, and its implementing *581regulations clearly direct when an employer must return an employee to his job. The triggering event is a return-to-work certification by the employee’s physician. Here, the employee provided his physician’s return-to-work certification with the caveat “as soon as Employer allows.” We conclude that the certification was sufficient to trigger the employer’s obligation to return the employee to work and we therefore reverse the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the employer.

FACTS

¶2…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Regina R. King v. Preferred Technical GroupCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Linda K. Brumbalough v. Camelot Care Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Alfredo Diaz v. Fort Wayne Foundry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Rodney Harrell v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chaney v. Providence Health CareWashington Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API