Legal Opinion

Chaney v. Providence Health Care

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2013No. 87056-0PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chambers, J.*

¶1 Robert Chaney was fired from his position and argues his termination violated the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, as a matter of law. The employer, Providence Health Care d/b/a Sacred Heart Medical Center & Children’s Hospital (Providence), claims no violation of the FMLA occurred. The trial court denied motions for a directed verdict on the issue by both Chaney and Providence. Based upon undisputed facts, we hold the trial court erred in failing to grant Chaney’s motion for a directed verdict that as a matter of law the hospital…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. All Around Underground, Inc. v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Impoundment of Chevrolet TruckWashington Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. BasehoreWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Brandon Foster v. Frito Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. City Of Tacoma v. Kathleen ManciniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Edwin Wells, et ux v. Nespelem Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Imelda Magdaleno v. Walmart Stores & Department Of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API