Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Greysolon Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1927No. 25,617PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Plaintiff commenced six separate actions against the G-reysolon Company, joining one of its stockholders as a defendant in each action. The cases were consolidated for trial. When the defendants rested, verdicts in plaintiff’s favor were directed. This is an appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for judgment or a new trial.

In August, 1922, George E. Lynott, a Duluth dealer in real estate, obtained an earnest money receipt for the purchase of 48 lots in Harrison’s Division of Duluth for $48,500. According to the terms of the receipt, $9,500 was paid when it was issued;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roseberry v. Hart-Parr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Olson v. PettiboneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Prigge v. SelzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Follingstad v. SyversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Erickson v. FrazierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Beasley Hardware Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Sorenson v. Greysolon Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API