Legal Opinion
Olson v. Pettibone
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 1, 1926No. 25,638PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from an order overruling defendant Pettibone’s demurrer to the complaint, the question thereby presented being certified as important and doubtful.
The action is brought to rescind a contract for the sale of plaintiffs’ homestead and certain personal property thereon used in conducting a summer resort on a lake at Shoreham, this state.
The complaint alleges that defendant, More, a real estate broker of Fargo, North Dakota, solicited the sale of plaintiffs’ property, stating that he had a person at that place who might be willing to purchase, and that plaintiffs consented to sell…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New-York Central Ins. Co. v. . National Protection Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
- City of Findlay v. PertzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Ferguson & Fries v. GoochSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Hunter Realty Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Truslow v. Parkersburg Bridge & Terminal RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Winget v. RockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Kansas Life Insurance v. First BankTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- White v. BoucherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.