Prigge v. Selz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Waseca county to recover $3,000 for false representations in inducing plaintiff to purchase the stock in trade of Dahl & Lust. Defendant obtained an order requiring plaintiff to show cause why an order should not be made vacating the attempted service of the summons and complaint upon defendant. The matter was heard before Childress, J., who discharged the order to show cause.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Waseca county to recover $3,000 for false representations in inducing plaintiff to purchase the stock in trade of Dahl & Lust. Defendant obtained an order requiring plaintiff to show cause why an order should not be made vacating the attempted service of the summons and complaint upon defendant. The matter was heard before Childress, J., who discharged the order to show cause. The answer alleged that defendant was incorporated under the laws of Illinois, was not doing business in Minnesota, and at the time of the service had no officer or agent within the…
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendant made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but made no motion for a new trial and this court cannot grant a new trial upon this record. If the court had jurisdiction of defendant, the only question for consideration is whether there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to-sustain the verdict. Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. Williams, 128 Minn. 514, 151 N. W. 419, L.R.A. 1915D, 1077; Helmer v. Shevlin-Mathieu Lumber Co. 129 Minn. 25, 151 N. W. 421; Daily v. St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. 129 Minn. 432, 152 N. W. 840; Bosch v. Chicago, M. & St. P.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- W. J. Armstrong Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Busterud v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Atkinson v. United States Operating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parker v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Louis F. Dow Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Richer v. BurkeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Solosky v. J. A. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Martin v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.