Legal Opinion

Follingstad v. Syverson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1926No. 25,040PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibble, J.

Action to recover damages for fraudulent representations alleged to have been made by the defendants upon the sale of land to the plaintiff. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $10,000. The defendants appeal from the order denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The case was here in 160 Minn. 307, 200 N. W. 90, and injunctive relief given the plaintiff.

On April 19, 1920, the defendants sold the plaintiff 50 acres of farm land just outside 'of the village of Wanamingo, in Goodhue county, for $23,000, or $460 per acre, of which $6,000l was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Columbia Electric Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Follingstad v. SyversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Adan v. SteinbrecherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Brown v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. Greysolon Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Hoeft v. RaddatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. State v. BenhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. State v. SackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Jasmer v. EngelmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API