Legal Opinion

Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1959No. 37,571PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to findings in favor of defendant after denial of plaintiff’s motion to amend the findings. There was no motion for a new trial.

Defendant, Kenneth R. Campbell, as vendor, and one Atwood Cranston, as vendee, entered into a purchase agreement dated March 10, 1953, for the sale of a tract of land located in Hennepin County, said tract being a part of outlot 15, as shown on the plat of Wayzata. By the terms thereof, the purchase price of $4,500 was to be paid as follows: $500 down, $1,000 payable on or before May 1, 1953, and the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Gentry v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, IowaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Costello v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API