Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Greysolon Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1928No. 26,529PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from an order denying her alternative motion for judgmént non obstante or a new trial.

The facts are stated in 170 Minn. 259, 212 N. W. 457. We may add that the 24 notes of $375 each were dated November 1, 1923. Waters Company, the payee, on November 16, 1923, transferred these notes to the Newton Syndicate, sometimes mentioned in the record as Prindle & Company, which in 1925 transferred them to plaintiff. The payee indorsed the notes Avithout recourse and, when they were acquired by plaintiff, her name Avas Avritten into the blank indorsement.

When plaintiff became the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sorenson v. Greysolon Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Olsen v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API