Steinhart v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J. —
Article XIII A of the California Constitution (article XIII A), which the voters adopted in June 1978 as Proposition 13, limits the ad valorem tax on real property to 1 percent of the property’s “full cash value.” (Art. XIII A, § 1, subd. (a).) As relevant here, section 2, subdivision (a), of article XIII A (sometimes hereafter section 2, subdivision (a)), defines “full cash value” as the 1975-1976 assessed value of the property adjusted for inflation, or the appraised value of the property upon a “change in ownership” occurring after the 1975-1976 assessment. The issue this…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Flintkote Co. v. Aviva PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- In Re SchwarzkopfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Castaneda v. Department of Corrections & RehabilationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Schafer v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.California Supreme Court · 2017
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.