Legal Opinion

Steinhart v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2010No. S158007PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J. —

Article XIII A of the California Constitution (article XIII A), which the voters adopted in June 1978 as Proposition 13, limits the ad valorem tax on real property to 1 percent of the property’s “full cash value.” (Art. XIII A, § 1, subd. (a).) As relevant here, section 2, subdivision (a), of article XIII A (sometimes hereafter section 2, subdivision (a)), defines “full cash value” as the 1975-1976 assessed value of the property adjusted for inflation, or the appraised value of the property upon a “change in ownership” occurring after the 1975-1976 assessment. The issue this…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Flintkote Co. v. Aviva PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. In Re SchwarzkopfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Castaneda v. Department of Corrections & RehabilationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Schafer v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.California Supreme Court · 2017

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API