Hunter v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Two issues only are raised on this appeal: (1) Is there sufficient credible evidence to support the department’s finding that, at the time of the accident, the appellant was not performing services growing out of and incidental to her employment? and (2) Is it constitutionally impermissible for the attorney general to appear on behalf of a state agency or department in an appeal of a departmental finding or order?
Sufficiency of evidence.
This case involves the application of the “traveling salesmen’s statute” — sec. 102.03 (1). (f) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this state. That statute…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Neese v. State Medical Society of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Rathjen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Lager v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- CBS, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Farmers Mill of Athens, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Mitchell v. Goodyear Service StoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.