Mitchell v. Goodyear Service Store
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Chief Judge.
This is, to say the least, an unusual appeal. It is unusual for a number of reasons. First, the appellant, John D. Mitchell, Sr., is not really the appellant. Instead, the real parties in interest are Mitchell’s counsel, Clay M. Barnes, Esq. (Barnes), and the law firm of Barnes and Raine, P.A. Second, the appellee, Goodyear Service Store, is not the true appellee, inasmuch as Goodyear, to use the vernacular, “could care less” about the outcome of this appeal. The true appellee, whose status as such is somewhat dubious, is the Workmen’s Compensation Commission. How and why…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Resetar v. State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Evertsen v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Maryland Board of Pharmacy v. Peco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Maryland Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Professional Land Surveyors v. ArmacostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Engel & Engel, P.A. v. IngermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Workers' Compensation Commission v. MayCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Mitchell v. Goodyear Service StoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Rogers v. WelshCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.