Legal Opinion
Neese v. State Medical Society of Wisconsin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The principal issue is: Did the accident take place while the respondent-employee was engaged in a deviation from his employment and engaged in an act not reasonably necessary for living or incidental thereto within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act?
The statute, sec. 102.03 (1) (f), provides:
“Every employe whose employment requires him to travel shall be deemed to be performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment at all times while on a trip, except when engaged in a deviation for a private or personal purpose. Acts reasonably necessary for living or incidental…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Hansen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Vande Zande v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- CBS, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.