Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 18, 1943No. 30727PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
On November 29, 1938, Emmett Johnson was discharged from the police force of the city of Tulsa. Approximately two years later, on November 6, 1940, Johnson instituted this action against the city of Tulsa and certain named officials thereof seeking in a first cause of action to recover his salary as policeman from and after December 1, -1938, and in a second cause of action to obtain a mandatory injunction restoring him to his position as a member of the police force of the city of Tulsa.
Issues were joined by the defendant city. When the cause came on for trial in June of 1941 a jury was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ramsey v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Tulsa v. District Court of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Shawnee v. HewettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Jurd v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Tulsa v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jones v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- City of Tulsa v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Miller v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- City of Tulsa v. JacobsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- City of Tulsa v. McMillanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.