Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Langley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 16, 1946No. 30672PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an action by Harve N. Langley, as survivor of the partnership of Langley & Langley, attorneys, to recover a money judgment against the city of Tulsa for the alleged value of legal services asserted to have been rendered that municipality pursuant to agreement.
The cause was instituted and prosecuted to judgment in the district court of Tulsa county. It was tried to the court without the aid of a jury. The judgment was against the city for the principal sum of $14,100.
The defendant city appears before this court as plaintiff in error, thus reversing the order of appearance. Our…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. MullinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Wyatt-Doyle & Butler Engineers, Inc. v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Morris v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Morris v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.