Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bayless

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1953No. 35663PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlackbird, J.

Defendants in error, Tulsa city policemen with ranks and grades varying from sergeants to captains, commenced this action as plaintiffs to restrain and enjoin plaintiffs in error, as defendants, from demoting them to other policemen’s positions of inferior rank with attendant reductions in salary, responsibility and dignity.

The threatened demotions were to be made without regard to said plaintiffs’ “good behavior”, without notice and hearing, not for economic or financial reasons, not for the purpose of reducing the number of policemen in the department, nor to reduce the number of positions…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Hopkins v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. City of Wewoka v. RodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Hall v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Cook v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Bekins v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. State Ex Rel. Livingston v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API