Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 11, 1944No. 30728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

On November 29, 1938, J. W. Jacobs and 14 other policemen of the city of Tulsa were discharged or dismissed from active duty for economic reasons impelled by constitutional requirements. Mr. Jacobs, who had been a member of the police department of the city since 1932, was assigned to duty as a uniform radio patrolman.

On October 12, 1940, Mr; Jacobs instituted this action in the district court of Tulsa county against the city of Tulsa and various named officers thereof. Two causes of action were joined by the plaintiff; the first to recover salary alleged to have accrued in plaintiff’s favor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Kimberlin v. Commission to Five Civilized TribesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. City of Tulsa v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Molacek v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indiana State Highway Commission v. ZehnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Jones v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Opinion No. (1989), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API