Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Dabney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 9, 1928No. 19696PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
This is an original action filed in this court for the purpose of compelling the Attorney General of this state by writ of mandamus to approve certain bonds authorized by the voters of the city of Tulsa at an election held therein on the 6th day of December, 1927.
Said bonds so authorized were known as “Fire Station and Fire Department Equipment Bonds of Tulsa, Okla., 1927,” and.b'eing for $115,000 and1 intended to be used as providing funds for purchasing sites for the construction, improving, and equipping fire stations and purchasing additional equip ment for the fire department of the said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Joint School Dist. No. 132 v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Home Fire Assur. Co. of New York v. Mid-West Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- City of Tulsa v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Opinion No. (2010), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2010