Legal Opinion
Jurd v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 17, 1938No. 28250PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The plaintiff, a member of the fire department of the city of Tulsa, instituted this action to recover the difference between the salary actually paid him during a certain period of time and the amount he would have received had he been paid the salary prescribed by ordinance. The verdict of the jury and judgment of the court were for the defendant city, and the plaintiff appeals.
Prior to the beginning of the fiscal year involved, the members of the fire department entered into a contract with the mayor and city council wherennder said firemen agreed to accept a 10 per cent, reduction in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ramsey v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Ryan v. Roach Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Public Service Company of Oklahoma v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Anadarko Funeral Home v. ScarthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Board of Com'rs of Caddo County v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- City of Tulsa v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- City of Tulsa v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Southern Corrections Systems Inc. v. Union City Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- City of Morris v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.