Legal Opinion

In Re Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2006No. 05-0250PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original mandamus proceeding, the relators Dillard Department Stores, Inc. and Grizelda Reeder (collectively “Dillard”) challenge the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration under an arbitration agreement between Dillard and an employee, Andrea Martinez. The court of appeals denied Dillard’s petition for writ of mandamus. We hold that the arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable and that Martinez’s claims fall within the terms of the agreement. Because the trial court clearly abused its discretion in denying the motion to compel arbitration we conditionally…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Plains Exploration & Production Company v. Torch Energy Advisors IncorporatedTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Baker Hughes Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Kennedy Ship & Repair, L.P. v. Pham, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  4. In Re NEXT Financial Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Polymerica, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2009

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API