Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill
joined by Justice HECHT, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN, Justice BAKER, Justice ABBOTT, and Justice HANKINSON, and by Chief Justice PHILLIPS and Justice GONZALES as to Parts I and IV.
The contingent fee contract that underlies this dispute allowed the plaintiffs’ law firm to charge an additional five percent fee in the event the case was “appealed to a higher court.” We must decide whether the law firm breached the contract by charging its client the additional fee when the defendant, to preserve its right to appeal, filed a cash deposit in lieu of a cost bond with the trial court shortly before…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by473 opinions
- Frost National Bank v. L & F Distributors, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Mullins v. TestAmerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation v. Henry Andrew Hansen, II, M.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
- In Re BP Products North America, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
468 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.