Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Baker Hughes Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MICHAEL MASSENGALE, Justice.
Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Baker Hughes Incorporated are in the midst of an arbitration proceeding to resolve patent disputes. A disagreement has arisen about whether the presiding panel of arbitrators has jurisdiction to determine a discrete subissue raised by Baker Hughes in the proceeding. Schlumberger contends that the subissue should be resolved by the same panel, but Baker Hughes argues that the issue is governed by a prior settlement agreement between the parties and must be resolved by the mediator who facilitated that agreement.
Baker…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Halliburton Energy Servs., Inc. v. Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Petrofac, Inc. v. DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Schlumberger Limited and Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Charlotte RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Anthony Aldridge v. Thrift Financial Marketing, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Trafigura Pte. Ltd. v. CNA Metals Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.