Legal Opinion

In Re NEXT Financial Group, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2008No. 08-0192PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether a former securities broker must arbitrate a claim that his employer wrongfully discharged him for refusing to commit an illegal act. See Sabine Pilot Serv., Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, 734-35 (Tex.1985). We hold that the employee’s Sabine Pilot claim falls within the scope of his arbitration agreement and is not subject to an exception limited to statutory employment discrimination claims. Because the trial court erroneously denied the employer’s motion to compel arbitration, we conditionally grant mandamus relief.

In September 2006, NEXT…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Jody James Farms, Jv v. the Altman Group, Inc. and Laurie DiazTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Pinto Technology Ventures, L.P. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Carr v. MAIN CARR DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Hawthorne Townhomes, L.P. v. Branch, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  5. In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API