Legal Opinion
Central Bank for Savings v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 16, 1988No. 5522PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
The defendant planning and zoning commission of the town of Cromwell (commission) appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiff Central Bank for Savings (bank) from a decision of the commission changing the zone classification of a fifty-four acre parcel of undeveloped land owned by the bank. The land was changed from a Planned Residential Development District 2 (PRD-2) zone, permitting multi-family development at a density of six units per acre, to a Residence District A-25 zone, authorizing only single-family dwellings on a minimum lot area of 25,000…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Sowin Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Tanner v. Conservation Commission of NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Dram Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Homart Development Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.