Legal Opinion
Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 30, 1988No. 6174PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing their appeal from a decision of the board of zoning appeals of the town of Mont-ville which granted six variances from the bulk area requirements and a variance permitting the use of an undersized lot for an accessory building. We find no error.
The facts relevant to this appeal are not in dispute. On March 19, 1981, Joseph and Marjorie Fisher purchased the lot that is the subject of this appeal. The lot, which is 97 feet by 87 feet (8439 square feet), is located on the northwest side of Lake Drive in Mont-ville,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Jaser v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Pike v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.