Legal Opinion
Tanner v. Conservation Commission of Norwalk
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 26, 1988No. 5741PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant conservation commission of the city of Norwalk appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiffs, Seaborne Herbert Tanner, Jr., et al. The plaintiffs had sought to obtain the defendant’s approval for the construction of a single-family dwelling on their combined adjoining property. The commission claims that the trial court erred (1) in finding that it had acted without substantial evidence in its denial of the application, (2) in finding that all of the expert witnesses had agreed that the proposed residences would have no significant impact…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Bradley v. Inland Wetlands AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Milardo v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Strong v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.