Legal Opinion

Martin v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1917No. S. F. No. 8213. In BankPublishedCited by 78 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to be directed against the Superior Court of the County of Alameda. Hon. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action in the superior court of the county of Alameda against Ergo A. Majors, to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s minor daughter, alleged to have been occasioned by the wrongful acts of Ergo A. Majors. After the commencement of this action this petitioner, who is a day laborer, married and the father of ten minor children, all of whom are living and dependent upon him for support, sought leave of the court to be allowed to prosecute his action in forma pauperis. His application was supported by an affidavit to the effect that, saving for his chose in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffreySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Peters v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Estate of SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Shawn Garfield Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API