Legal Opinion

Trigg v. Timmerman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1916No. 13048PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Brawley, J., entered March 19, 1915, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for an injunction, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Plaintiff, George S. Trigg, seeks to have the defendants, Timmerman and wife, restrained from maintaining upon their land certain drainage ditches from which water flows upon his land. Trial of the case in the superior court for Whatcom county resulted in judgment for the defendants, from which plaintiff has appealed.

For a period of some twenty years or more, appellant has owned a farm, in Whatcom county, consisting of a square forty-acre tract, and also, in connection therewith, a right of way for road purposes over a strip of land twenty-five feet wide adjoining his farm on the north.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lambert v. AlcornIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Manteufel v. WetzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Miller v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Noyes v. CosselmanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Currens v. SleekWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Currens v. SleekWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Island County v. MacKieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API