Legal Opinion

Noyes v. Cosselman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1902No. 4240PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from ¡Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Geokge W. Belt, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

Plaintiffs are tlie owners of several tracts of land comprising’ about 450 acres, in Spokane county. These lands are flat and level, having formerly been swamps, hut in the last eighteen years have been drained by means of ditches, at large expense to the plaintiffs, so that they are now valuable hay lands, producing annually large crops of timothy hay. Trying to the southwest of the lands of plaintiffs is a large marsh, about, three miles in length, of varying width, comprising about 3J5 acres of land. This marsh, commonly called “Long…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barkley v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Livingston v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Cass v. DicksWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. O'Brien v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thompson v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Wilber Development Corp. v. Les Rowland Constr., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Gaines v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API