Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Alcorn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1893PublishedCited by 76 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Dorrance Dibell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bailey

This was a bill in chancery, brought by Menzo Lambert and Hannibal Hill against Joseph Alcorn, to restrain the defendant from putting in a system of tile drains on his own land, and extending the same across certain adjoining land belonging to Mary Wilson, whereby the surface water on the defendant’s land would be discharged into a ditch in a public highway, whence it would flow on to and across the lands of the complainants towards a stream known as Indian Creek. The defendant is the owner of a tract of land of somewhat irregular shape, containing about 160 acres, the north line of the tract…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peck v. HerringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Jevne & Almini v. OsgoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Dayton v. Drainage CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Anderson v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Walker v. PritchardIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Thompson v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Nestor Johnson Manufacturing Co. v. GoldblattIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Schien v. City of VirdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API