Legal Opinion

Currens v. Sleek

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1999No. 66830-2PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

983 P.2d 626 (1999)

138 Wash.2d 858

Cal CURRENS and Elsa M. Currens, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Irene SLEEK, Dennis Stephenson, and Jane Doe Stephenson, individually and as a marital community, Dennis Stephenson Logging, a solo proprietorship and Gary and Barbara Hanson, individually and as a marital community, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 66830-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued February 10, 1999.

Decided September 9, 1999.

Bricklin & Gendler, Ms. Jennifer A. Dold, Seattle, amicus curiae on behalf of Washington Environmental Council.

Mr. John S. Karpinski, Vancouver, for Petitioner.

Mr.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. MilnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Grundy v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Grundy v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API