Carolina Plating Works, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
Plaintiffs are landowners in South Carolina, who allege that their property was taken as a result of the application of the Rails-to-Trails Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1241-51 (2006). The court certified a class on October 28, 2009. Pending are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment regarding how just compensation should be calculated in this matter. Those motions have been fully briefed and argued. For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that the existence of genuine issues of material fact precludes it from granting either party’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ingram v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Pew Forest Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Longnecker Property v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.