Legal Opinion

Pew Forest Products v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 7, 2012No. 09-814CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

In this government contract ease, Pew Forest Products (Pew) alleges that the United States Forest Service (the Forest Service) breached its timber sale contracts by delaying logging operations, and by failing to provide plaintiff with the contractual remedies for that delay to which it was entitled. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Following oral argument, and after further review of the briefs and accompanying appendices, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES plaintiff’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment.

I.…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Urban v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Lcc-Mzt Team IV v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API