Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 28, 1982No. 82-3022PublishedCited by 276 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc. (BFI) is a “joint employer” within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Thus, we are required to define the standard to be utilized in making this determination.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) determined that BFI was a “joint employer.” It then held that BFI had engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA (29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1)) when it fired three drivers jointly employed by the company and its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Radio & Television Broadcast Technicians Local Union 1264 v. Broadcast Service of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- South Prairie Construction Co. v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Condenser Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Patricia Thompson v. Real Estate Mortgage NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Norma J. Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Joyce Whitaker v. Milwaukee County, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.