Legal Opinion

Salazar v. Matejcek

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 2016No. A144106PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DONDERO, J.

— Defendant Ross Matejcek appeals from the judgment of the trial court following a bench trial in which the court awarded damages associated with his encroachment on a neighboring parcel of rural property owned by plaintiffs Maria Salazar, her son Ernesto A. Salazar, Jr., and other family members. In addition to damages for encroachment, the court awarded treble damages for defendant’s removal of timber and issued a mandatory injunction requiring him to restore plaintiffs’ land. Plaintiffs have filed a cross-appeal raising various objections, including a challenge to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Fulle v. KananiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Caru Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API