Legal Opinion
D & D Landholdings v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2008No. 06-877 LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, D & D Landholdings, LP, brings a Fifth Amendment takings claim alleging that defendant, acting through agents for the Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), and the United States Border Patrol (“Border Patrol”), has effectuated the taking of its property for public use, Am. Compl. II13, and without just compensation, id. UH14-16. Specifically, plaintiff claims that defendant’s construction of a border fence…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Briseno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- International Industrial Park, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Kepa Dakota, Jv v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014