Legal Opinion
Briseno v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 18, 2008No. 08-74 LPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BUSH, Judge.
The court has before it defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ suit, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), or, in the alternative, under RCFC 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs seek compensation for one incident of timber trespass by the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).1 Defendant’s motion is denied in part, and stayed in part.
BACKGROUND2
Plaintiffs Victor and Paula Briseno own property which abuts the Cibola National Forest, near Grants, New Mexico. Compl. ¶¶ 3^4, 9, 12. The Forest…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Peoples v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Marchena v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- G4s Technology LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Dean v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.