Legal Opinion
Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 5, 2009No. 06-167LPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
In this Fifth Amendment takings case, Plaintiffs seek just compensation for the United States Border Patrol’s alleged physical taking of eleven parcels of largely undeveloped land (“the subject property”) located adjacent to the Mexican Border in San Diego County, California. The Border Patrol has monitored the subject property since the 1970s as part of its mission to prevent, detect, and apprehend illegal aliens seeking to enter the United States. In 1992, Plaintiff Rancho Vista del Mar granted the Border Patrol a twenty-foot-wide easement along the Mexican…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett, Tillie Goldring, as Trustees, and Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Love Terminal Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.