Legal Opinion
Asato v. Emirzian
California Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1918No. S. F. No. 7464PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
This action for conversion grew out of the following facts: On June 8, 1909, the parties entered into a contract whereby for a specified consideration plaintiff, Asato, agreed to grow and deliver to defendant Emirzian four thousand orange trees, delivery thereof to be made in June, 1911. For some reason not material to the issues in this case, the trees were not delivered, and Emirzian instituted suit for the specific performance of the contract, the result of which was a decree entered in his favor on March 28, 1912. After an appeal from this judgment by Asato…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ashton v. HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ward v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Dowdell v. CarpyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Emirzian v. AsatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- State Nat. Bank v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lucas v. First Nat. Bank of PawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Alamitos Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Story v. ChristinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Levy v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Oakland v. ButeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.