Legal Opinion
City of Oakland v. Buteau
California Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14804PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Two appeals by the plaintiff are presented. The first is from a judgment confirming the title of the parties in and to certain property adjacent to San Antonio Estuary in Oakland Harbor; and the second is from an order fixing the amount to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendants for the use and occupation of a portion of said property. The appeal from the judgment will first be considered.
Prior to 1912 the defendants, as trustees of the Merritt Hospital, were the owners of real property in the city of Oakland bounded on the north by First Street, on the east by Washington Street,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Weber v. Board of Harbor CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Hoboken v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Herschel Bullen, Mary H. Bullen, J. C. Hayward and Marian S. Hayward v. B. De Bretteville, Treasure Company, Walter B. Scoville and the Adamant Company, B. De Bretteville and Treasure Company v. Walter B. Scoville and the Adamant Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- City of Newport Beach v. FagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. HeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Carpenter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Miramar Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.