Legal Opinion

Dowdell v. Carpy

California Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1902No. S.F. No. 2106PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

In this case it is conceded by respondent that “appellant’s statement of the facts, so far as it goes, is substantially correct.” In stating the case we will therefore content ourselves with following the language of appellant’s opening brief as nearly as convenient.

On October 15, 1894, the plaintiffs gave to the Bank of St. Helena their promissory note for twenty-five thousand dollars, secured by a mortgage upon about four hundred and fifty thousand gallons of wine, together with certain machinery, cooperage, and other articles. On January 15, 1895, plaintiffs gave to the bank…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Clark v. ChildMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Peck v. McLeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Alamitos Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. City of Oakland v. ButeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Asato v. EmirzianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Beloit v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API