Ashton v. Heydenfeldt
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Action to recover possession of “shares of stock.” Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, plaintiffs having declined to amend, judgment of dismissal was entered, and plaintiffs appeal.
The property sought to be recovered is described thus: “Four thousand six hundred and seventy-four shares of the capital stock of the Zeila Mining Company, a California corporation,” which stock, it is alleged, was the property of said Solomon Heydenfeldt at the time of his death, and ever since has been the property of his estate; that on October 23, 1893, the superior court made a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Weller v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Clark v. NordholtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Applegaeth v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Welco Electronics, Inc. v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Cheney v. TrauzettelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.