Legal Opinion

State Nat. Bank v. Ladd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 31, 1916No. 7911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from County Court, Carter County; Thomas W. Champion, Judge. Action by O. B. Ladd against the State National Bank. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

On the 10th day of January, 1912, the Ardmore State Bank recovered judgment against O. B. Ladd, for the sum of $269.90, together with foreclosure of mortgage on tuo mules, one wagon, one cow, and cotton crop. Thereafter, on the 16th day of January, 1912, an order of sale was duly issued, and said property advertised and sold thereunder on (lie 80th day of January, 1912, for $68.50. On the 27th d£ty of February, 191.2, after the sale of said property under said order of sale, said Ladd filed a supersedeas bond of said judgment rendered against him. Thereafter this cause…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palmer v. . FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Gray v. BrignardelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. Miller v. . AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Dusenbury v. . KeileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Mark v. . HyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Oakland v. ButeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Griggs v. BrandonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Asato v. EmirzianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Laird v. VogelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API