Montague v. Dougan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
This case is an action of assumpsit, originally brought before a justice of the peace in the city of Niles. The plaintiff declared upon the common counts, adding thereto a bill of particulars of his demand. The defendant pleaded the general issue, with notice of set-off and of money tendered, and deposited with the court the amount tendered, being $16.32, and costs, $1.75.
The plaintiff recovered judgment before the justice for $93.73, and, on appeal by the defendant to the circuit court *99for the county of Berrien, the plaintiff recovered $101.78. It was tried in the circuit, before Judge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Larson v. JensenMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Webster v. WrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Edwards v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Brown v. WeightmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Winslow v. Dakota Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crampton v. CramptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Lester v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Seventh-Day Adventist Publishing Ass'n v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Cameron Lumber Co. v. SomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Baxter v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.