Cameron Lumber Co. v. Somerville
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Antrim; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by the Cameron Lumber Company against Matthew Somerville for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff sued to recover a balance of $126.79 and interest thereon, claimed to be due from defendant. The case was tried by a jury, who returned a verdict for $119.07 and interest thereon. The case is brought here by writ of error.
It is claimed the court erred in admitting in evidence the books of plaintiff without calling all the clerks who made the entries. It was shown that the books were books of original entries; that they were properly kept; that settlements had been made with different parties, and the books had never been disputed, and the parties who settled from them had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Battishill v. HumphreysMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. HessMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Lester v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. SwartzMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Seventh-Day Adventist Publishing Ass'n v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Antrim Iron Co. v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Consolidated Kansas City Smelting & Refining Co. v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Smaltz v. NewhofMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Hillman v. HulettMichigan Supreme Court · 1907