Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Dakota Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Clay county, Stearns, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Berry, J.1

This is an action for the price of goods alleged to have-been delivered to Joseph Thompson, upon defendant’s agreement to pay for the same. Thompson had taken a contract to haul logs for defendant, and the goods were supplies furnished him “in and about” the performance of his contract.

The point principally argued and elaborated here is that the verdict in favor of plaintiffs is not justified by the evidence. This was so strenuously contended for by defendant’s counsel that we have examined the settled case with unusual pains; and while, in accordance-with our usual practice in such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. LambSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mount v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Gardner v. Gauthier Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  3. Coleman v. Retail Lumbermen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Montague v. DouganMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Sanders v. HodgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API