Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Reynolds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wisner, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Charles H. Baxter and another against DeElbert A. Reynolds to recover a bill for printing.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant to recover a bill for printing, which they claim was to be paid by him. It was the defendant’s claim that the printing was done for the Ancient Order of Loyal Americans, and that the credit was extended to that order, and not to the defendant. The case was tried by a jury, who rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiffs filed with their declaration a bill of particulars. They were allowed on the trial to show that, after all the work was done, the defendant looked over their books containing the items embraced in their bill of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lester v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Seventh-Day Adventist Publishing Ass'n v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Montague v. DouganMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cameron Lumber Co. v. SomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Smaltz v. NewhofMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API