Legal Opinion

State v. K. K. G.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 2014No. 301313285; A154815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment that ordered his involuntarily commitment under ORS 426.130 for a period not to exceed 180 days. As stated in the general judgment of commitment, the trial court found that appellant “is suffering from a mental disorder, is a danger to himself and others, will not benefit from voluntary commitment and although is able to provide for his basic personal needs, outside the institutional setting is not now receiving such care as is necessary for his health and safety.” Appellant raises two assignments of error. In his first assignment of error, he argues…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Matter of ChristoffersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. L. J. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. S. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API